Re: namespace for new templates

From: Andrus Adamchik (andru..bjectstyle.org)
Date: Fri May 13 2005 - 09:52:14 EDT

Next message: Mike Kienenberger: "Re: comons-logging (was Re: Updating dependent libs)"

Previous message: Mike Kienenberger: "Re: namespace for new templates"
In reply to: Mike Kienenberger: "Re: namespace for new templates"
Next in thread: Mike Kienenberger: "Re: namespace for new templates"
Reply: Mike Kienenberger: "Re: namespace for new templates"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

>
>> So why is there a leading "_" in "_1_2"? The name looks cleaner
>> without it. I don't think there is any reason to follow Java
>> identifier rules to that level.
>
> Eclipse complained when I used 1_2 as a package name. I assumed 1_2 was
> illegal.

Still don't like the "_" :-)

How about "v1_2"?

Andrus

Next message: Mike Kienenberger: "Re: comons-logging (was Re: Updating dependent libs)"
Previous message: Mike Kienenberger: "Re: namespace for new templates"
In reply to: Mike Kienenberger: "Re: namespace for new templates"
Next in thread: Mike Kienenberger: "Re: namespace for new templates"
Reply: Mike Kienenberger: "Re: namespace for new templates"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Fri May 13 2005 - 09:52:15 EDT