Re: namespace for new templates

From: Mike Kienenberger (mkienen..laska.net)
Date: Fri May 13 2005 - 10:31:27 EDT

Next message: Mike Kienenberger: "Re: cgen class/package attributes"

Previous message: Mike Kienenberger: "Re: cgen class/package attributes"
In reply to: Andrus Adamchik: "Re: namespace for new templates"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Andrus Adamchik <andru..bjectstyle.org> wrote:
>
> >
> >> So why is there a leading "_" in "_1_2"? The name looks cleaner
> >> without it. I don't think there is any reason to follow Java
> >> identifier rules to that level.
> >
> > Eclipse complained when I used 1_2 as a package name. I assumed 1_2 was
> > illegal.
>
> Still don't like the "_" :-)
>
> How about "v1_2"?

That's fine with me.

Next message: Mike Kienenberger: "Re: cgen class/package attributes"
Previous message: Mike Kienenberger: "Re: cgen class/package attributes"
In reply to: Andrus Adamchik: "Re: namespace for new templates"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Fri May 13 2005 - 10:29:24 EDT