My apologies... It looks like the discussion revolving around XStream
went nowhere... Anyway, this is something you guys should definately try
to resolve before 1.2 final because once you're out the door with
XMLEncoder you're going to have to support it and it's a nightmare doing
so. :P XStream is strictly zero configuration at a slight performance cost.
Gili
Mike Kienenberger wrote:
> Gili, you generate a lot of email, and you'll get better responses if
> you try to search our mailing list archives first for some of the more
> theoretical stuff.
>
> A search on XStream and Cayenne (even in google) will give you a past
> history on the topic.
>
> On 9/6/05, Gili <cowwo..bs.darktech.org> wrote:
>
>> BTW: I noticed you added XMLEncoder support in Cayenne 1.2... You might
>>want to take a look at XStream if you haven't already. I've used it for
>>months now and it seems to be better than XMLEncoder in every possible
>>way. Best of all, it is far easier to use.
>>
>>Gili
>>--
>>http://www.desktopbeautifier.com/
>>
>
>
-- http://www.desktopbeautifier.com/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Tue Sep 06 2005 - 11:28:09 EDT