Re: DataContextFactory

From: Kevin Menard (kmenar..ervprise.com)
Date: Fri Sep 16 2005 - 09:40:19 EDT

Next message: Andrus Adamchik: "Re: 3T Relationships [are done]"

Previous message: Mike Kienenberger: "Re: DataContextFactory"
In reply to: Mike Kienenberger: "Re: DataContextFactory"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sep 16, 2005, at 9:04 AM, Mike Kienenberger wrote:

> The current implementation doesn't limit anything. It simply
> performs an unnecessary new ObjectStore(DataRowStore) construction,
> which, in the case of providing your own ObjectStore, can be ignored
> and will be garbaged-collected.

My bad. Thanks for clarifying.

-- 
Kevin

Next message: Andrus Adamchik: "Re: 3T Relationships [are done]"
Previous message: Mike Kienenberger: "Re: DataContextFactory"
In reply to: Mike Kienenberger: "Re: DataContextFactory"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Fri Sep 16 2005 - 09:40:25 EDT