Ok, sounds good to me.
Gili
Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>
> On Sep 18, 2005, at 2:22 PM, Gili wrote:
>
>> You talk about removing log4j's jar from the client. How can you
>> do this without discarding all logging? If you run into a
>> logger.info("foo") won't it throw ClassNotFoundError?
>
>
> internals will be replaced by commons-logging - it is lighter and not
> that invasive as it can be configured to work with all major logging
> implementations... But no exposure of this in the method signatures
> either.
>
> Andrus
>
>
-- http://www.desktopbeautifier.com/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Sun Sep 18 2005 - 14:53:23 EDT