Yes, I also don't know what SPI means. However, at least in the J2EE
world, it seems more common to have "api" instead of "spi" el-api,
jsf-api, servlet-api, etc.
I'm not doing any of the work, but you might want to consider
cayenne.jp-api and cayenne.jp-impl instead.
On 2/17/06, Tore Halset <halse..vv.ntnu.no> wrote:
> On Feb 16, 2006, at 23:00, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>
> > I did some refactoring to split the common JPA spec code from
> > Cayenne-specific stuff. My (unproven) idea is that the resulting
> > implementation will be more flexible and easy to share with others
> > if we keep everything that does not depend on cayenne.jar in a
> > separate package ("cayenne.jpa" and "cayenne.jpa.spi"). All things
> > that require an import from cayenne.jar would go into "cayenne.cjpa".
>
> That makes sense. I did not understand all those acronyms :)
>
> - Tore.
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Fri Feb 17 2006 - 17:34:55 EST