> And I (as a user) would like to see Cayenne "just working". Really, "just working", nothing more :).
> All other extra things that make the first and most important thing of "just working" less reliable
> or less functional or a PITA should not be done IMHO. If it "just works" than afterwards there's
> still time to do all sort of ...
>
A couple of observations...
1. Maven affects no one, but those few who compile the src. Like
Andrus, I am doubtful about its value to Cayenne but keeping an open
mind till we can play with Bill's work.
2. At this juncture, only cayenne-jpa is being "mavenized". The rest
will probably follow suit if this is successful, but this is happening
one step at a time.
3. This has lots to do with geronimo... sounds like you don't have the
full context of this discussion. I suggest you read the rest of the
thread and/or the related maven/jpa threads :)
(p.s. if it's not broken doesn't apply because its not yet created!!!)
Cris
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Tue Feb 28 2006 - 13:45:48 EST