I've been looking at the low level api a bit more.
I think our best bet is to write a db adapter, rather than a jdbc
driver (although the jdbc driver would be interesting as it would
enable a much broader range of persistence support, ie, not cayenne-
centric).
I may play with this idea some. Definitely... intrigued. :)
Robert
On Apr 10, 2009, at 4/101:06 PM , Mike Kienenberger wrote:
> A little bit more on the topic since there's some interest:
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Max Ross <maxr+appeng....oogle.com>
> Date: Apr 8, 4:59 pm
> Subject: Java Database Connectivity (JDBC)
> To: Google App Engine for Java
>
> Sounds very interesting! It would certainly open up a lot of
> additional
> frameworks for use on App Engine. I can't think of any security
> restrictions that would prevent you from implementing a jdbc driver
> that
> wraps the datastore service, so by all means go for it!
>
> Max
>
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Thomas Mueller
> <thomas.tom.muel....mail.com
>> I am the author of the H2 Database Engine, and I think about writing
>> an open source "JDBC to com.google.appengine.api.datastore wrapper".
>> That way people can use SQL and the JDBC API (or other libraries that
>> use it).
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Fri Apr 10 2009 - 17:28:53 EDT