>
> Well, please understand that I'm writing this not because I need it but
> because others have requested it and I can see value in having it. At the
> moment, all my projects are in maven, so it made it a lot easier to test
> that way. Frankly, I'd just assume write in jRuby and use buildr. The
> process would be a lot simpler for me.
Please feel free to correct me if I'm wrong, but:
- shouldn't exactly the same functionality be in Cayenne Modeler, the Maven
and the ANT task regarding the reverse engineering process? I.e. from the
same user input parameters to produce exactly the same output - aka a nice
and correctly generated datamap?
- Cayenne Modeler already does this reverse engineering, so the
functionality is practically already there?
- the Maven and the ANT task would be than just a wrapper to call that
functionality?
- this would be than similar to the case of Cayenne ClassGeneration?
If so, than wouldn't be the first step to refactor the actual Cayenne
Modeler functionality(the already working) that already does reverse
engineering to some common classes in:
org.apache.cayenne.gen.*
like it was done for ClassGeneration?
to be simply callable from the Maven and ANT task, thus making them trivial
to implement?
Thank you,
A.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Sat Apr 11 2009 - 05:45:44 EDT