How are you envisioning injecting an ObjectContext for different DataNodes, etc?
Thanks,
mrg
On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 4:57 PM, Andrus Adamchik <andru..bjectstyle.org> wrote:
> Just for kicks wrote a simple DI container for Cayenne. I checked it in
> partially to sanbdox folder until the ASF SVN repo went down
> (http://monitoring.apache.org/), so I'll commit the rest on Monday, or
> whenever SVN becomes available.
>
> This no-frills DI container took me only a couple of hours to write (it
> borrows some Guice API, but implementation is all mine). It supports
>
> * annotation-based field dependency injection
> * binding interfaces to implementation classes via fluent API
> * binding interfaces to "provider" (same as "factory") classes
> * merging multiple DI "modules".
>
> The whole thing is only 14K after compilation (so it beats all full featured
> DI containers in size). Of course that's because it doesn't have all the
> fancy stuff (of which we'll add at least a few more things) such as
> constructor injection, dependency cycle resolving, dynamic interface
> proxies, bound object lifecycle, integration with Spring, etc. Since we are
> not planning a general purpose container, we might survive without most of
> those.
>
> Here is how the current Configuration class might look like when it is based
> on DI:
>
> public class Configuration {
>
> private Injector injector;
>
> public Configuration() {
> this(new CayenneModule());
> }
>
> public Configuration(Module... modules) {
> this.injector = DIBootstrap.createInjector(modules);
> }
>
> public DataChannel getDataChannel() {
> return injector.getInstance(DataChannel.class);
> }
>
> public ObjectContext getNewContext() {
> return injector.getInstance(ObjectContext.class);
> }
>
> // we may create getters for other "services" if we need to
> }
>
> And the actual configuration class (aka "module") used above:
>
> public class CayenneModule implements Module {
>
> public void configure(Binder binder) {
> binder.bind(EventManager.class).to(EventManagerImpl.class);
> binder.bind(DataChannel.class).to(DataDomain.class);
>
> binder.bind(QueryCache.class).toProvider(LRUCacheFactory.class);
> binder.bind(QueryLogger.class).toProvider(FancyLogger.class);
> // an so on...
> }
> }
>
> "CayenneModule" is what users can override (e.g. simply subclass), providing
> alternative implementations for some services.
>
> The next step in this prototype would be an attempt to define the current
> Cayenne stack in terms of DI.
>
> Andrus
>
> On Oct 27, 2009, at 11:01 PM, Kevin Menard wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 5:05 PM, Andrus Adamchik <andru..bjectstyle.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> And I just discovered that both Spring (3.0RC1) and Juice (trunk) support
>>> the annotations from this JSR. So it could make sense for us to use these
>>> annotations internally as well. Couldn't dig any info on the Tapestry IoC
>>> support for this JSR, but they are on the JSR "support group", so at
>>> least
>>> they are watching it.
>>
>> Thiago, the Tapestry member on the support group, just learned that it
>> had been approved. Howard didn't even know the JSR existed. There's
>> no discussion on adding in the annotation support to Tapestry IoC and
>> I suspect it will happen, but Tapestry is behind the ball on that one.
>>
>> --
>> Kevin
>>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Mon Nov 16 2009 - 09:29:57 EST