This is all absolutely right, that's why I'm also all for taking the golden
middle in Cayenne, specifically leaving only Persistent interface dependency
2009/11/19 Kevin Menard <nirvdru..mail.com>
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 9:11 AM, Michael Gentry <mgentr..asslight.net>
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 7:56 AM, Andrus Adamchik <andru..bjectstyle.org>
> wrote:
> >> No question, this can be useful. Where this gets in the way is with our
> >> elusive goal of providing persistence for POJOs without a
> framework-mandated
> >> superclass.
> >
> > Maybe I'm just old fashioned, but I actually like inheriting behavior.
> > I also like being able to step through the code to see what it does.
>
> You're not alone. I found the whole POJO movement set me back a bit.
> Debugging dynamically enhanced classes is a major PITA. Having said
> that, issues related to multiple inheritance are also annoying. It
> could be a lot easier to introduce persistence into an existing
> codebase if you don't have to change the class hierarchy.
>
> --
> Kevin
>
-- Andrey
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Thu Nov 19 2009 - 10:04:36 EST