Re: CVS migration note

From: Mike Schrag (mschra..dimension.com)
Date: Mon Apr 24 2006 - 08:00:07 EDT

  • Next message: Alexander Trofimchouk: "can't open inputStream for plist"

    Yeah, I agree ... Since you're going above-and-beyond the call of
    duty by hosting, if SVN is less pain for you, I say go for it.
    However, I don't currently use SVN. What "features" of the
    Subversion Eclipse plugins should I prepare to get really annoyed with?

    On Apr 24, 2006, at 4:02 AM, Ulrich Köster wrote:

    > If it makes life easier for you I'm for it.
    > Am 24.04.2006 um 09:29 schrieb Andrus Adamchik:
    >
    >> Beware that "CVS vs. Subversion" is the #1 cause of flame wars in
    >> many developer communities lately ;-)
    >>
    >> I personally don't care either way as a programmer (both work),
    >> but from the server maintenance perspective I'd prefer SVN because
    >> of better permissions control, integration with Apache and most
    >> operations performance.
    >>
    >> Or so I think, as I've never run it on the server myself. But I
    >> ran CVS and it is rather inflexible. The only way of access I am
    >> comfortable with is SSH tunneling by trusted users.
    >>
    >> My $0.02 - like I said either way is fine with me.
    >>
    >> Andrus
    >>
    >> P.S. Still no fresh tarball on sourceforge. Waiting...
    >>
    >> On Apr 24, 2006, at 11:05 AM, Ulrich Köster wrote:
    >>
    >>> But where is the advantage?
    >>>
    >>> Uli
    >>> Am 24.04.2006 um 04:49 schrieb Brendan Duddridge:
    >>>
    >>>> Me too!
    >>>>
    >>>> ___________________________________________________________________
    >>>> _
    >>>> Brendan Duddridge | CTO | 403-277-5591 x24 |
    >>>> brenda..lickspace.com
    >>>>
    >>>> ClickSpace Interactive Inc.
    >>>> Suite L100, 239 - 10th Ave. SE
    >>>> Calgary, AB T2G 0V9
    >>>>
    >>>> http://www.clickspace.com
    >>>>
    >>>> On Apr 23, 2006, at 6:59 PM, Pierre Frisch wrote:
    >>>>
    >>>>> I would vote for that
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Pierre
    >>>>>
    >>>>> On 23-Apr-06, at 9:26 AM, Ken Anderson wrote:
    >>>>>
    >>>>>> Why not migrate to Subversion at the same time! :)
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>> Ken
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>> On Apr 23, 2006, at 12:21 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>>> Per our private conversation with WOLips committers I am
    >>>>>>> going to migrate CVS from SourceForge to ObjectStyle.
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>> *** Please do not commit code until further notice!
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>> I just tagged the repository with "cvs_objectstyle_migration"
    >>>>>>> tag and planning the actual migration to happen around 7 AM
    >>>>>>> GMT tomorrow, Monday. But this can be postponed if
    >>>>>>> SourceForge fails to make a fresh CVS tarball by then.
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>> I'll send a note once the migration is done.
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>> All committers, please send me your SSH public keys (I think
    >>>>>>> I have Ulrich's already).
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>> Andrus
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>>
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>
    >
    > Mit freundlichen Grüßen
    >
    > Ulrich Köster
    >
    > Assense Software Solutions GmbH
    > Stadtdeich 27
    > 20097 Hamburg
    >
    > Fernsprecher: +49 (0)40 3037579-0
    > Fernkopierer: +49 (0)40 3037579-9
    >
    >
    >
    >



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Mon Apr 24 2006 - 08:01:12 EDT