Next message: Guido Neitzer: "Re: WOComponents, Packages, and Protected variables."
- Previous message: Kieran Kelleher: "Re: WOComponents, Packages, and Protected variables."
- In reply to: Mike Schrag: "Re: WOComponents, Packages, and Protected variables."
- Next in thread: Anders Peterson: "Re: WOComponents, Packages, and Protected variables."
- Reply: Anders Peterson: "Re: WOComponents, Packages, and Protected variables."
- Reply: Mike Schrag: "Re: WOComponents, Packages, and Protected variables."
- Reply: Chuck Hill: "Re: WOComponents, Packages, and Protected variables."
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
Mike Schrag wrote:
> This "bug" is actually fixed in newer builds ... Maybe only in the 3.3
> one, not sure, but it's REALLY for the best to fix this properly in your
> code.
>
> ms
3.3... Is this an eclipse bug?
From the other answers it seems I misunderstood the original question.
I thought David was looking for the KeyValueCodingProtectedAccessor class.
I have one of these in every package containing components.
/Anders
- Next message: Guido Neitzer: "Re: WOComponents, Packages, and Protected variables."
- Previous message: Kieran Kelleher: "Re: WOComponents, Packages, and Protected variables."
- In reply to: Mike Schrag: "Re: WOComponents, Packages, and Protected variables."
- Next in thread: Anders Peterson: "Re: WOComponents, Packages, and Protected variables."
- Reply: Anders Peterson: "Re: WOComponents, Packages, and Protected variables."
- Reply: Mike Schrag: "Re: WOComponents, Packages, and Protected variables."
- Reply: Chuck Hill: "Re: WOComponents, Packages, and Protected variables."
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0
: Thu Aug 16 2007 - 11:58:16 EDT