Re: WOComponents, Packages, and Protected variables.

From: Mike Schrag (mschra..dimension.com)
Date: Thu Aug 16 2007 - 12:49:19 EDT

Next message: Mike Schrag: "Re: WOComponents, Packages, and Protected variables."

Previous message: Kieran Kelleher: "Re: WOComponents, Packages, and Protected variables."
In reply to: Anders Peterson: "Re: WOComponents, Packages, and Protected variables."
Next in thread: Chuck Hill: "Re: WOComponents, Packages, and Protected variables."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Whoops .. sorry .. misread. I thought he was talking about the
WOLips validator complaining. The validator in WOLips would complain
even if you were not using packages. THAT bug has been fixed.

On Aug 16, 2007, at 11:56 AM, Anders Peterson wrote:

> Mike Schrag wrote:
>> This "bug" is actually fixed in newer builds ... Maybe only in the
>> 3.3 one, not sure, but it's REALLY for the best to fix this
>> properly in your code.
>> ms
>
> 3.3... Is this an eclipse bug?
>
> From the other answers it seems I misunderstood the original
> question. I thought David was looking for the
> KeyValueCodingProtectedAccessor class.
>
> I have one of these in every package containing components.
>
> /Anders

Next message: Mike Schrag: "Re: WOComponents, Packages, and Protected variables."
Previous message: Kieran Kelleher: "Re: WOComponents, Packages, and Protected variables."
In reply to: Anders Peterson: "Re: WOComponents, Packages, and Protected variables."
Next in thread: Chuck Hill: "Re: WOComponents, Packages, and Protected variables."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Thu Aug 16 2007 - 12:50:27 EDT