On Mar 21, 2008, at 12:16 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:
> I think most people just end up generating both the getter and
> setter, so they never notice?
I suspect that you are correct.
> I actually was checking the inverse case when I started working on
> this particular bug (make sure you have the set) -- and hadn't
> considered that you might just not even define the "get".
I probably focus too much on eliminating unneeded code.
Aloha,
Art
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Fri Mar 21 2008 - 18:32:01 EDT