On Jul 10, 2008, at 4:47 PM, Pierce T. Wetter III wrote:
>
> On Jul 10, 2008, at 4:33 PM, Lachlan Deck wrote:
>
>> On 11/07/2008, at 3:50 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:
>>
>>> On Jul 9, 2008, at 8:41 PM, Henrique Prange wrote:
>>>
>>>>> The rest of the patternsets are also not an Ant issue, but a
>>>>> design philosophy in woproject (to not force a project layout).
>>>>
>>>> Maven don't force a directory layout also.
>>>
>>> My point was that using either Maven or woproject, if you want a
>>> flexible layout you need to do more work. If you can accept a set
>>> layout, your life is easier. It is not an Ant vs Maven issue as
>>> Pierce was suggesting.
>>
>> Right. It's another alternative.
>>
>> I don't know if Pierce's intention was to create a this vs that
>> thing in general... more of a 'what works for him' thing which he
>> thought he'd share. Obviously, assuming this assumption is correct,
>> this was taken instead as an early jab given Mike's on the verge of
>> dropping the classpath <boom> ;-)
>
> Yeah, that was my intention, I dislike Ant, but like WOProject, and
> wish Ant worked like WOProject.
WOProject _is_ Ant. I think it is WOLips that you like. :-)
> I do some stuff in the GUI, and I'm done. If Mike is making
> WOProject work more that way, coolness!
I have hope.
Chuck
--Practical WebObjects - for developers who want to increase their overall knowledge of WebObjects or who are trying to solve specific problems. http://www.global-village.net/products/practical_webobjects
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Thu Jul 10 2008 - 19:52:38 EDT