Argh.. According to their website, SourceForge "fixes" pserver access
almost every month. I guess there is no more hope this will ever happen.
As for the "strong mentality", I like Subversion too. My only concern
is Subclipse plugin quality. While CVS plugin for Eclipse makes CVS
limitations next to invisible, from my earlier experience Subclipse
had so many problems of its own, that I had to use command line most
of the time ...
svn status |grep "^\?" |awk '{print $2}' |xargs svn add
fun, isn't it :-)
Latest feedback on that isn't very reassuring either:
http://www.objectstyle.org/cayenne/lists/cayenne-devel/
2005/06/0026.html
Other than that, it is was mainly sysadmin concerns, nothing along
the lines of "cvs vs. svn". I guess I should try Subclipse again. If
the experience is bearable, it may become a strong enough incentive
to do the switch.
Andrus
On Sep 13, 2005, at 3:08 PM, Kevin Menard wrote:
> On Sep 13, 2005, at 3:03 PM, Gili wrote:
>
>> Plus, you could migrate to Subversion at the same time. You
>> guys are familiar with it right? :) I also get about a 75% failure
>> rate.
>>
>
> While I personally like using Subversion, there was a strong
> mentality of "if it's not broke, don't try to fix it" here.
> Despite my own preference, I do have to agree with those sentiments.
>
> --
> Kevin
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Tue Sep 13 2005 - 15:34:09 EDT