Eclipse SVN support was weaker for me than Eclipse CVS support.
I also haven't tried upgrading recently, though. I wish I could
remember what missing functionality I was seeing, but I don't. It
seems like it was something to do with comparisons or
synchronizations.
I'm now having to use SVN for MyFaces so it's likely I'll hit it again
now that I'm working with JSF again this week.
On 9/13/05, Andrus Adamchik <andru..bjectstyle.org> wrote:
> Argh.. According to their website, SourceForge "fixes" pserver access
> almost every month. I guess there is no more hope this will ever happen.
>
> As for the "strong mentality", I like Subversion too. My only concern
> is Subclipse plugin quality. While CVS plugin for Eclipse makes CVS
> limitations next to invisible, from my earlier experience Subclipse
> had so many problems of its own, that I had to use command line most
> of the time ...
>
> svn status |grep "^\?" |awk '{print $2}' |xargs svn add
>
> fun, isn't it :-)
>
> Latest feedback on that isn't very reassuring either:
>
> http://www.objectstyle.org/cayenne/lists/cayenne-devel/
> 2005/06/0026.html
>
> Other than that, it is was mainly sysadmin concerns, nothing along
> the lines of "cvs vs. svn". I guess I should try Subclipse again. If
> the experience is bearable, it may become a strong enough incentive
> to do the switch.
>
> Andrus
>
>
>
> On Sep 13, 2005, at 3:08 PM, Kevin Menard wrote:
> > On Sep 13, 2005, at 3:03 PM, Gili wrote:
> >
> >> Plus, you could migrate to Subversion at the same time. You
> >> guys are familiar with it right? :) I also get about a 75% failure
> >> rate.
> >>
> >
> > While I personally like using Subversion, there was a strong
> > mentality of "if it's not broke, don't try to fix it" here.
> > Despite my own preference, I do have to agree with those sentiments.
> >
> > --
> > Kevin
> >
> >
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Tue Sep 13 2005 - 15:40:52 EDT