Re: Java 5

From: Craig L Russell (Craig.Russel..un.COM)
Date: Mon Aug 06 2007 - 12:02:08 EDT

  • Next message: Matt Kerr (JIRA): "[JIRA] Created: (CAY-844) _Auto classes should be "abstract""

    I don't have details in front of me, but I understand that many of
    the popular Concurrent classes have been back-ported to Java 1.4. If
    you like, I can get more details if you can't find it on the Internet.

    The back-port classes don't use the new Java byte-codes that were
    added in Java 5 so there still is some performance improvement in
    Java 5. But if the alternative is to require Java 5, some users might
    want to take a bit lower performance instead.

    Craig

    On Aug 6, 2007, at 8:19 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:

    >
    > On Aug 5, 2007, at 5:39 AM, Kevin Menard wrote:
    >
    >> the new concurrent API could yield significant speed improvements.
    >
    > Being all backwards compatible, I haven't played much with that,
    > but I suspect that things like ConcurrentHashMap should help us to
    > improve throughput of DataRowStore and EventManager. So I am
    > softening my stand against 3.0 switch to Java 5 :-)
    >
    > Maybe a poll on the user list is a good idea?
    >
    > Andrus
    >
    >
    >

    Craig Russell
    Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
    408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russel..un.com
    P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!





    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Mon Aug 06 2007 - 12:02:43 EDT