RE: SCM Repository

From: Gentry, Michael \(Contractor\) ("Gentry,)
Date: Tue Sep 13 2005 - 16:09:01 EDT

  • Next message: Andrus Adamchik: "Re: 3T Relationships [are done]"

    Voodoo? You young whippersnappers with your bloated GUIs and XML and
    dual-core CPUs and 8 GB of RAM. All you really need is a good shell.
    Although, I have to admit, I like my shell to be running inside a nice
    NeXTstep/OS X Terminal window. I had a 444 column window just the other
    day (yes, I was using it). OK, so I had to use two monitors to do it,
    too. So, maybe GUIs aren't all bad, but there is nothing wrong with a
    good grep/awk/xargs, either. :-)

            -----Original Message-----
            From: Kevin Menard [mailto:kmenar..ervprise.com]
            Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2005 3:37 PM
            To: cayenne-deve..bjectstyle.org
            Subject: Re: SCM Repository
            
            

            On Sep 13, 2005, at 3:34 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:

                    Argh.. According to their website, SourceForge "fixes"
    pserver access almost every month. I guess there is no more hope this
    will ever happen.

                    As for the "strong mentality", I like Subversion too. My
    only concern is Subclipse plugin quality. While CVS plugin for Eclipse
    makes CVS limitations next to invisible, from my earlier experience
    Subclipse had so many problems of its own, that I had to use command
    line most of the time ...

            Perhaps I was mistaken then. FWIW, in the past three releases,
    Subclipse has advanced tremendously. I urge you to give it a go.

                    svn status |grep "^\?" |awk '{print $2}' |xargs svn add

                    fun, isn't it :-)

            You and Michael with your voodoo tools.

                    Latest feedback on that isn't very reassuring either:

            
    http://www.objectstyle.org/cayenne/lists/cayenne-devel/2005/06/0026.html

                    Other than that, it is was mainly sysadmin concerns,
    nothing along the lines of "cvs vs. svn". I guess I should try Subclipse
    again. If the experience is bearable, it may become a strong enough
    incentive to do the switch.

            
            
            Like I said, 0.9.33 is really quite good. It bundles JavaSVN
    now too, so if you have JavaHL headaches, you can always just use
    JavaSVN and get rid of them.
            
            
            --
            Kevin



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0.0 : Tue Sep 13 2005 - 16:09:05 EDT